Hi All - From Lion IRC

[Reforged]

Sorry? Did you just imply that asking whether you believe hermaphrodites to be abominations is the same as asking you if you believe overweight ladies to be abominations?

Nope

Now, watch carefully what comes next....

I think both minorities would be rather offended by that comparison.

You mean the comparison YOU made?

The idea that you think a severe genetic defect comparable to a weight condition is quite horrendous.

No - the idea that YOU think that is horrendous.
The idea that YOU want to project that thinking onto others is worse.

I sincerely hope we are not to take this as the typical view held by your religion.

It's not. And I dont.

I wonder what W.L. Craig would say about this rather ugly insinuation hastily made to dodge a simple question.

What ugly insinuation? The one YOU keep hammering on with?

Mr Craig is probably used to atheists making ugly insinuations about what Christians really mean

I threw up in my mouth when you said you - quote - ''sincerely hope'' - unquote - that I wasnt going to be baited into a discussion...about rough anal sex, prolapsed rectums, ''fat chicks'', hermaphrodites...(how long is your list?)

I'm not being evasive. I already told you, pages ago, I am not going to answer those (type of) questions.

Well that was entertaining, lets take a quick trip back to reality now:
What you said was that you didn't use terms like "fat chick". Then I changed the term and you didn't want to discuss "women of a large disposition" ingeneral. Then you accused me of a fixation with women of a larger disposition and then when I asked you about whether you considered hermaphrodites were abominations you responded "Hmmm. So it is a fixation." implying you bundled them in with women of a large disposition.

I find it somewhat shameful that you would rather bundle in those with a life altering defect of a genetic nature with those who have trouble with their weight than give a straight answer to a perfectly valid question.
My conclusion is that you consider them both abominations as you treat both subjects with equal disdain.
W.L. Craig would be ashamed of you and although I dislike him I'd be inclined to agree.