I don't follow your argument here. Clear up a few things.
This would be the point of disagreement.
So far so good. Though I'd add an "and is" at the end.
This would be the part I don't understand. What exactly are you trying to say here?
No one ever said it did.
(August 7, 2012 at 7:27 pm)whateverist Wrote: That functionality follows upon truth.
This would be the point of disagreement.
(August 7, 2012 at 7:27 pm)whateverist Wrote: Truth follows passively, recording what has been.
So far so good. Though I'd add an "and is" at the end.
(August 7, 2012 at 7:27 pm)whateverist Wrote: Truth can never be raised up, self supporting from the history of what has been functional and lead the way.
This would be the part I don't understand. What exactly are you trying to say here?
(August 7, 2012 at 7:27 pm)whateverist Wrote: The truth has no stake in where we are going.
No one ever said it did.