(August 9, 2012 at 7:13 pm)jonb Wrote:(August 9, 2012 at 6:53 pm)CliveStaples Wrote: Well, that's just an insult.
Oh I wish it were, but it seems in your persistence, to use meaningless formula it is proven.
"p => q" isn't meaningless. It means "p implies q".
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”