RE: The Need to Breed
August 19, 2012 at 11:01 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2012 at 11:03 pm by Cinjin.)
(August 15, 2012 at 6:59 pm)Rayaan Wrote: If overpopulation does become a problem in the future, then I think that it's going to be a hopeless situation.
We don't need to just slow our growth. We need to stop growing. We are at capacity.
(August 18, 2012 at 4:30 pm)Rhythm Wrote: No, human population isn't a factor.
No no you're right. Our atmosphere is in the exact same shape it was in the 1600's, as well as our water, animal species, glaciers, etc etc. Population is clearly NOT a factor.
Quote:a global population that was 1 billion in 1800 and 4 billion in 1980 will probably have grown to 10 billion by the end of this century; the demand for food will have doubled by 2050; food production already accounts for 30% of greenhouse gases – more than manufacturing or transport; more food needs more land, especially when the food is meat; more fields mean fewer forests, which means even more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which means an even less stable climate, which means less reliable agriculture
Quote:Most biologists agree we’re in the midst of the Earth’s sixth mass extinction event; species are disappearing about 1,000 times faster than is typical of the planet’s history. This time, though, it isn’t because of geologic or cosmic forces but unsustainable human population growth.
We’ve already witnessed the devastating effects of overpopulation on biodiversity: Species abundant in North America two centuries ago — from the woodland bison of West Virginia and Arizona’s Merriam’s elk to the Rocky Mountain grasshopper and Puerto Rico’s Culebra parrot — have been wiped out by growing human numbers.
Quote:Notice that we didn't mention climate change above, or the exploding population/consumption levels that are triggering it — the two major factors threatening humanity's future.
Quote:In “Why Have Children?: The Ethical Debate” (M.I.T. Press), Christine Overall tries to subject that decision to morally rigorous analysis. Overall, who teaches philosophy at Queen’s University, in Ontario, dismisses the notion that childbearing is “natural” and therefore needs no justification. “There are many urges apparently arising from our biological nature that we nonetheless should choose not to act upon,” she observes. If we’re going to keep having kids, we ought to be able to come up with a reason.