RE: Paul Ryan
August 20, 2012 at 11:37 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2012 at 11:40 pm by CliveStaples.)
(August 20, 2012 at 7:13 pm)Chuck Wrote: The fact that you are still allowed to post here nullifies any pitious squeak you might utter at the unfairness of it all.
I didn't say anything about unfairness. Even if I am allowed (for the sake of fairness) to flame just as much as you have, I wouldn't bother. It doesn't answer the factual question in the thread. It doesn't answer whether Paul Ryan supported a bill that would permit rapists to sue their victims to prevent abortions. That's an incredibly damning allegation, if true.
(August 20, 2012 at 7:39 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Considering that you aren't privy to what we do tolerate, because all warnings and such are done behind the scenes, your condemnation of the administrators reflects poorly on your character. If you have any issues with the admins. or mods. of this site, feel free to pm us, but whining about it openly to everyone else comes across as spineless.
I don't know what you tolerate. I'm not saying that you're tolerating him. I'm just saying--and I hope that most people would agree--that tolerating flaming (strings of insults with no substantive response) leads to a worse community.
But, hey, that's just the way I'd moderate if it were my site. You guys can run the site however you like--and you don't even have to tolerate criticism of how you choose to do so. If I've got a problem with a flamer, I can just ignore him.
Which I've just done! Happy moderating =)
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”