Daystar, sorry mate, but I don't understand your last post. You said: 'but I disagree with you that science can't sometimes be used in the same way'. Are you saying that it is used in the same way? If you are, can you give me an example, cos I'm struggling to think of one.
'Where does science disagree with the Bible?' I can't begin to answer this ('Christians' disagree amongst themselves on the bible), and I don't think it's a good idea to marry these two together at this point. The Bible is such a big topic all of it's own. I'm trying to understand if dna, rna etc, 'suggests' intelligence. This is proving a brain exploding task hence why I probably don't understand your post.
Leo, it's looking like I've entered a minefield and I'll concede at this point that 'language' or 'code' may not be an appropriate comparison, but even so I will continue in my studies and come back to you shortly.
regards Catherine
'Where does science disagree with the Bible?' I can't begin to answer this ('Christians' disagree amongst themselves on the bible), and I don't think it's a good idea to marry these two together at this point. The Bible is such a big topic all of it's own. I'm trying to understand if dna, rna etc, 'suggests' intelligence. This is proving a brain exploding task hence why I probably don't understand your post.
Leo, it's looking like I've entered a minefield and I'll concede at this point that 'language' or 'code' may not be an appropriate comparison, but even so I will continue in my studies and come back to you shortly.
regards Catherine
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility"
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
