RE: Where do atheists get their morality from?
September 1, 2012 at 7:27 am
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2012 at 7:30 am by Norfolk And Chance.)
(September 1, 2012 at 3:38 am)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote:(September 1, 2012 at 3:07 am)greneknight Wrote: I don't get it at all. Atheism doesn't allow for the legitimization of these crimes any more than science does. The way I see it is atheism has nothing to say about crimes. Neither does meteorology have anything to say about these crimes, but so what? You're not going to check with the weatherman before you step out? I don't see the relevance at all. And I'm not even an atheist.
This is a good question.
And I'm surprised it's coming from a theist. Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised, seeing as I've come across two or three Christians here, and they all seem to be relatively thoughtful and intelligent. We'll see as time passes.
Your contention seems to be that atheism does not inform ethics or morality. Atheism is atheism and ethics is ethics right?
Well it's more complicated than that. Positions in one field of knowledge can and often do have profound implications on other fields.
Consider naturalism. This would be a scientific position, right? (Well, technically it's a metaphysical position) Well consider how much, and how pointedly, naturalism responds to theological claims: about spirits, powers, miracles etc. A clear example of how a position in one field is profoundly relevant to a position in another.
Let's try another example: The theistic concept of god as all-good. This is a well-accepted property of most standard god-concepts. And at least in theology, Christians take it to be unquestionable. Now consider what this theological concept of an all-good, omniscient God has to say about ethics. If this concept is real, it profoundly effects our perspective of ethics. All of a sudden, we would turn to the gods for authority. Forget about gods being real- if one merely believed the theological proposition that God existed, their own ethical approach would be profoundly influenced.
Consider how medicine would change based on whether God did or didn't exist. How law would change. How economics would change... Does it seem at all plausible to say there is no connection between atheism and other beliefs then? Of course not. Our position on the matter truly has a lot to say about a lot of subjects. Most of all, morality.
Which is why we can never escape the problem of prescriptive moral relativism as an atheist. We must accept it, or work to change it.
Now just because you're a theist doesn't mean you are given a free-pass. You've surely taken plenty of flak for being a Christian (which I presume you might be). In fact, I'm surprised that you are a Christian at all. I suppose now would not be the best time to convert you to atheism, though. What, after pointing out that the status quo of atheism promotes rape apologetics and all....
This fucker is a theist pretending to be atheist and thinks he's far too clever.
We've never seen anything like that before...
(September 1, 2012 at 3:58 am)greneknight Wrote: [quote='Vincenzo "Vinny" G.' pid='330231' dateline='1346485126']
And it's not a safe bet that you will always have a benign vicar to do that. What if a fundy vicar takes over?
If religion and the bible was true you would never have two polar opposite vicars because there would be little to argue over and few bones of contention.
Think on.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.