Usually when one talks about the immorality of certain actions, it is discussed with the intent that there was a better solution, objectively or subjectively.
In that case, I'd like to then ask, given your reply, what was the better action then in your mind?
The Imperial Japanese asked to surrender with conditions, including that they keep their government, are not tried for war crimes and effect little to no change on Japanese society.
I can see how that request is intolerable to the Allies, especially given that the Imperial Japanese fought tooth and nail (using suicide bombers) for every strip of land given.
Would you allow their conditions to stand? Would you have chosen differently?
I am curious as to what you intend to change, if that was possible.
In that case, I'd like to then ask, given your reply, what was the better action then in your mind?
The Imperial Japanese asked to surrender with conditions, including that they keep their government, are not tried for war crimes and effect little to no change on Japanese society.
I can see how that request is intolerable to the Allies, especially given that the Imperial Japanese fought tooth and nail (using suicide bombers) for every strip of land given.
Would you allow their conditions to stand? Would you have chosen differently?
I am curious as to what you intend to change, if that was possible.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
