And why should a person have more freedom than they deserve?
What if that shows up in a psychological evaluation (which is would), and they are therefore denied the job of doing such? Especially if the person is cross referenced by several phycologists.
I would never allow it to be a single judgement: for many more than the reasons you list: that would be stupid.
Age is an ignorant identifier. Therefore use of it ignores the facts. As I have said previously... this system may be slightly beyond our technological level... but it is only slightly beyond such.
If you are making the case that maturity is subjective, then I will make the case that almost everything is... including human rights. And you support laws based upon those, do you not? Then why the double standard on something no different?
Do you not support individuality? If you do not, then you support perfect human cloning.
I have already shown how the system we have in place does not work 'absolutely fine'. It works for you, and it works for a moderate majority. But it is far from right for everyone.
Consider this... we are all different. Do you agree with this point? If it is true that we are all different (it is), then none of us are the same. Therefore a line of best fit misses most of us. An age line is such a line: your system is as far from perfect as is possible.
What if that shows up in a psychological evaluation (which is would), and they are therefore denied the job of doing such? Especially if the person is cross referenced by several phycologists.
I would never allow it to be a single judgement: for many more than the reasons you list: that would be stupid.Age is an ignorant identifier. Therefore use of it ignores the facts. As I have said previously... this system may be slightly beyond our technological level... but it is only slightly beyond such.
If you are making the case that maturity is subjective, then I will make the case that almost everything is... including human rights. And you support laws based upon those, do you not? Then why the double standard on something no different?
Do you not support individuality? If you do not, then you support perfect human cloning.
I have already shown how the system we have in place does not work 'absolutely fine'. It works for you, and it works for a moderate majority. But it is far from right for everyone.
Consider this... we are all different. Do you agree with this point? If it is true that we are all different (it is), then none of us are the same. Therefore a line of best fit misses most of us. An age line is such a line: your system is as far from perfect as is possible.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
