If You whip children with Sticks you are a child abuser and deserve to be in jail.

[Reforged]

Sick Christian fucks and their obsessions with 'sparing the rod'. They are just evil sadists and sexual fuck ups. .

i would have posted a imoticon beating a dead smaller imoticon but this is all they had, but it think your smart enough to figure things out.

Are you trying to say you've moved from children to beating farm yard animals to death instead?
Doesn't really sound healthy either way but whatever makes you happy. :-)

---

I can say with 100% accuracy that the book of Proverbs says you're wrong.

Prov 13:24: "He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes (diligently)."

Prov 19:18: "Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not thy soul spare for his crying."

Prov 22:15: "Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him."

Prov 23:13: "Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die."

Prov 23:14: "Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell (Shoel)."

Prov 29:15: "The rod and reproof give wisdom: but a child left to himself bringeth his mother to shame."

New Testament isn't getting left out of this one either, though.

Hebrews 12:6-7: "...the Lord disciplines those he loves, and he punishes everyone he accepts as a son. Endure hardship as discipline; God is treating you as sons. For what son is not disciplined by his father?"

You should do a little research, the word beat in Proverbs 23:13-14 is literally translated smite, which means to strike not beat as you would have it. Why do you think that discipline is bad, how do you think children will learn respect, by teaching themselves, oh yeah I've seen how well that has worked. The world is full of grown brats, self taught respect I imagine.

Proverbs 19:18 Discipline your son while there is hope, and do not desire his death. This is a translation into English as it is used and understood today, I don't know about you but I do not use 15th century English. So v.18 speaks against beating a child. I stand by what I stated previously.

By that same token are we allowed to discipline you if we don't agree with your actions?
I mean I wouldn't of thought that a man in favour of hitting a tiny, barely developed human being would object too much to a little correction now and then. :-)