One of those vagaries of English, divi Tiberio.
As George Carlin pointed out many years ago " Flammable. Inflammable. Non-inflammable. Why are there three? Shouldn't two words be enough to convey this idea? Either a thing flams or it doesn't."
As George Carlin pointed out many years ago " Flammable. Inflammable. Non-inflammable. Why are there three? Shouldn't two words be enough to convey this idea? Either a thing flams or it doesn't."