(September 26, 2012 at 7:13 am)Zen Badger Wrote:(September 26, 2012 at 7:09 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: If you'd elaborate your words a little bit further, I might reply to you properly. But I'm sure I've had this before already, heard them from the mouth of someone else, and will probably give the same reply.
I do not demand anything from anyone. I already have everything which I deem to be a "right" that I ought to have. If I lack something which I deem to be my right, I go and take it by blood. Not by mewling like a little baby, asking for assistance from others.
But you are reserving the right to marry the person you love whilst denying that right to homosexuals.
Ergo it is a special right because it does not apply to everyone.
"take it by blood"
I'm not reserving anything to myself. I already have these rights due to being someone that is able to bring forth a child from a marriage.
Homosexuals have no such abilities, their marriage is nothing but a simple contract. As such, their union does not represent what marriage stands for. Love? It's not love. You can have all the love you want without marriage.
Homosexuals never had the right to marry, for they were not really relevant to what marriage stands for.
If they demand marriage, they demand for special considerations to made available to them. Because without such things, they would never even be able to bring forth this issue up, friend.
Thankfully, such stupid things are not made a point of discussion where I live, and I can go through the day without thinking of homosexuals, and their supposed right to a "marriage", and how it will affect the next elections.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?