Live & Let Live. Sign This.

[kılıç_mehmet]

I'm not reserving anything to myself. I already have these rights due to being someone that is able to bring forth a child from a marriage.
Homosexuals have no such abilities, their marriage is nothing but a simple contract. As such, their union does not represent what marriage stands for. Love? It's not love. You can have all the love you want without marriage.
Homosexuals never had the right to marry, for they were not really relevant to what marriage stands for.
If they demand marriage, they demand for special considerations to made available to them. Because without such things, they would never even be able to bring forth this issue up, friend.
Thankfully, such stupid things are not made a point of discussion where I live, and I can go through the day without thinking of homosexuals, and their supposed right to a "marriage", and how it will affect the next elections.

So because they can't have children they can't marry. Is that what you're saying?

Not just that. There is a lot more. However I've already said this a lot of times until now. I really hate to repeat myself in front of the same people. Let us end this discussion here. Besides, it's not that they "can't" marry. With laws, you can even make a man marry a cardboard box if you wanted to. But whether it would constitute a marriage by definition and deed.....