RE: ಠ_ಠ
October 3, 2012 at 9:52 am
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2012 at 9:53 am by Something completely different.)
(October 3, 2012 at 9:12 am)A Theist Wrote: I agree. I don't think it's appropriate to use pictures of naked children in any kind of advertisement.
![[Image: holocaust_children.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.akcjadobrapolskaszkola.com%2Fart%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Fholocaust_children.jpg)
would you consider this to be child porn? or advertisment?
and how do you bring the therm "advertisment" into this? surely trying to raise the awareness of the general public on a issue could be called "advertisment" if one is trying to sell a product.
but in the case of raising awareness on a issue wich is a crime or other injustifiable action the term "advertisment" makes you sound like some coldhearted schwarzenegger machine.
or did you use this term on purpose to show your disregard towards that families claims?

