What is 'atheistic' that is definable then?
How can you be a fundy atheist about atheisticthings if we can't agree on what is atheistic? How can that be defined?
Fundamentalism has to be something that can be defined right? How can you have a fundy atheist about vague things that you say to be 'atheistic', what's atheistic?
For instance, one might want to argue that not believing in a 'soul' is atheistic, but how can you define that? Some atheists believe in souls (however few), Rhizo for example.
'Atheistic' all seems kind of vague, not exactly fundamentalism, so what is your point when you speak of 'fundy atheists'? And that they 'do exist'. This confuses me.
Atheistic=Of or pertaining to atheism, right? But what is of or pertaining to atheism, that can be defined precisely enough to support your point? This is what confuses me.
EvF
How can you be a fundy atheist about atheisticthings if we can't agree on what is atheistic? How can that be defined?
Fundamentalism has to be something that can be defined right? How can you have a fundy atheist about vague things that you say to be 'atheistic', what's atheistic?
For instance, one might want to argue that not believing in a 'soul' is atheistic, but how can you define that? Some atheists believe in souls (however few), Rhizo for example.
'Atheistic' all seems kind of vague, not exactly fundamentalism, so what is your point when you speak of 'fundy atheists'? And that they 'do exist'. This confuses me.
Atheistic=Of or pertaining to atheism, right? But what is of or pertaining to atheism, that can be defined precisely enough to support your point? This is what confuses me.
EvF
