RE: Evidence and probability go hand in hand?
November 6, 2008 at 2:13 pm
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2008 at 2:16 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
There is zero evidence for the supernatural, doesn't that make the supernatural improbable?
Or is that JUST because of the complexity thing?
I heard Carl Sagan said, and apparently he had took it from someone else, something like "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is that what you mean Adrian?
I just thought that because there's ZERO evidence for the supernatural that is at least partly connected to its improbability.
Or is that JUST because of the complexity thing?
I heard Carl Sagan said, and apparently he had took it from someone else, something like "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is that what you mean Adrian?
I just thought that because there's ZERO evidence for the supernatural that is at least partly connected to its improbability.
