Hare Krishna

[Akincana Krishna dasa]

You started out by behaving as if all atheists say that, on top of assuming that atheism has something to with "something coming from nothing," which no theory ever said. You can't call bullshit until you stop spewing it. You might think I'm snarky, but I'm being honest. Your evidence it not evidence. Your complaints against atheism thusfar have had naught to do with atheism. Being absolutely frank, you have nothing but shallow rhetoric, yet you busted in the door like a hyped up Kool-aid man claiming that you were going to blow people's minds. I reiterate: Read about the Big Bang Theory before you try to claim it has something to do with everything coming from nothing (even a brief read will show you otherwise). Separate existential crises from atheism. Realize that antitheism and atheism are different. Simmer down on the ignoring points because you don't like the delivery. Then . . . discuss.

I haven't offered you any evidence for anything, nor have I claimed to. I feel like I've hardly said anything, but that you've already taken any small thing in a really bad way.

I really think you took my "blow your mind" comment way too seriously. It was a joke. I promise, I'm not going to blow your mind. You're obviously really smart - you've got links to child abuse cases in my religion and everything.

Often, it seems like atheists only get to debate with fanatical Christians, who have a weird book and a lot of weird ideas to try to defend. At least, that's most of what I can find on youtube. Most of the default religion-is-so-stupid stuff comes from people disgusted with Christianity.

I got saved from the Bible, though, so maybe that's a little more fun for you people, I don't know.

I'm happy to get to know you and stuff. Sorry my questions offended you so badly and make you think I'm so horrible, right from the start.

I do know the Big Bang theory doesn't claim something comes from nothing. But in that case, I still think there are troublesome gaps in theorizing a godless universe. Please, teach me I'm wrong.

---

His feelings that your feelings are special are special...and therefore invalid? You just used the same argument you said was invalid to invalidate itself. New idea: ignore all special feelings and just look at the actual evidence.

They might be completely valid. And the flying spaghetti monster might exist. The point is, he has no evidence that there is no God and that all religious experience is fake.