Hare Krishna

[Nine]

Someone else on this forum today told me that maybe in a million years scientists could create life from chemicals. No scientist can create any living thing from raw chemicals. They've tried. Nor can scientists can bring any dead organism back to life.

Like I said we have a "good understanding" scientists have found multiple ways that life could have started. Just because we haven't done something yet doesn't mean that its hasn't ever happened.

I watched Richard Dawkins say we don't know how life started. Watch him, maybe 10-15 minutes in:

*sigh*

We don't know for certain but the evidence points to things like abiogenesis. Pure chemistry which funnily enough is what human are made of and all animals for that matter. We may be very interesting chemistry but nothing more.

In my opinion, without evidence that life can be reduced to chemistry, you can't say the foundation of reality is only to be understood by physics and chemistry.

Oh yes it can. I'd like to see what you think can't be explained by these. Do you think your made up of something other than chemicals that are made up of atoms and electrons? If so show me. Prove it. Then I will have a reason to accept your claims.

Life comes from life - that's what I think makes sense.

What you think makes sense and what actually makes sense are completely different.

I'm fine with the fact that you have no evidence for God.

Nor do you.

Just be real: you don't have evidence for lots and lots (and lots and lots) of things that you believe.

Perhaps not evidence but very good reasons to accept things. If there is something that I think is true that turns out not to be then I will change my mind when I am provided with a good reason to.

Plus most things I accept as true would not require me to dedicate my life to them and pray to them. Nor do I base the rest of my life on these things.

And btw these lots and lots and lots of things are probably quite few in number lol.