Today, my daughter will mostly be wearing...

[Ryft]

Of course I know what atheism means. That was my whole point. Considering that atheism is defined by just the one non-belief, the rejection of theism ... What is your point?

Holy shit, Evie. Stop eating all that eucharistic fucking spaghetti and start eating more fish or something. Your brain is clearly starving for more Omega 3 in your diet because you're forgetting posts (other than your own) made only hours ago and pretending issues weren't already discussed. I already said (Msg. #117) that my statement did not reference atheism. Try to keep track of the argument, please, because arguing in circles is something that fundies—

Oh, wait. I see. Maybe YOU are one of those fundy atheists and, hence, the love for arguing back around in a circle.

Stop pretending I said they are fundy about atheism. That is an unhelpful Straw Man already obviated. I said 'fundy atheists' are those who fundy about their atheistic views—be what they may, because there are a lot of views an atheist can hold: on ethics, on epistemology, on metaphysics, etc., all of which must be atheistic if he or she is consistent. And don't go forgetting what that words means again: it means those views (whether ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, etc.) are "godless," which means "understood and engaged without any reference to god(s)."

Please give me an example of something atheistic that can't apply to non-atheists. That's what I'm confused about.

... I did. Message #126. It's not even 24 hours old.