Hare Krishna

[Akincana Krishna dasa]

Again. *theory*. Scientists develop *theories* then test their truth value through various experiments. If evidence is found during this process that increases the truth value of that theory then it is further studied and tested until they have enough evidence to reach a certainty level of sigma 7.
Certainty is only gained in degrees. For example we can be 99.9999981% sure the theory of gravity is legitimate. That is one of the most backed theories there is.
There is no theory in science that is given 100% certainty because that would remove possibility of error, further enquiry or new evidence coming to light.

You are quoting a theory that there is no adequate means to test yet. As such it should be treated solely as a theory without evidence. An interesting avenue for exploration that holds theoretical value. Nothing more and nothing less.
No faith required.
If you had done the tiniest bit of research before making these claims you would know this.
You have not and I'm sorry but it really shows.

Ok, you're making so much sense now! Wow, I really am so stupid, thanks for pointing that out.

If a religious person makes a claim, even if there's evidence, the smart thing to do is mock it and think it's ridiculous. Obviously nothing like that could be true because... I don't want it to be!

But if there is a scientific theory out there that supports atheism, it should be taken extremely seriously, even if there's no evidence for it, and anyone who asks for evidence and shows a little skepticism is obviously so dumb!

Thanks for pointing this out!

---

Like I said we have a "good understanding" scientists have found multiple ways that life could have started. Just because we haven't done something yet doesn't mean that its hasn't ever happened.

*sigh*

We don't know for certain but the evidence points to things like abiogenesis. Pure chemistry which funnily enough is what human are made of and all animals for that matter. We may be very interesting chemistry but nothing more.

Oh yes it can. I'd like to see what you think can't be explained by these. Do you think your made up of something other than chemicals that are made up of atoms and electrons? If so show me. Prove it. Then I will have a reason to accept your claims.

What you think makes sense and what actually makes sense are completely different.

Nor do you.

Perhaps not evidence but very good reasons to accept things. If there is something that I think is true that turns out not to be then I will change my mind when I am provided with a good reason to.

Plus most things I accept as true would not require me to dedicate my life to them and pray to them. Nor do I base the rest of my life on these things.

And btw these lots and lots and lots of things are probably quite few in number lol.

Do you hear yourself??? These really sound like good arguments to you???

"Just because we have no evidence doesn't mean it's not 100% truth, as long as it supports atheism! It only makes sense to be really, deeply skeptical of ideas I don't like!"