RE: C---------
September 21, 2009 at 6:25 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2009 at 6:27 pm by Violet.)
(September 21, 2009 at 5:44 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(September 21, 2009 at 4:18 pm)Saerules Wrote: As far as I am aware, my ideas have only been refuted by statements of 'it is not realistic', or 'impossible'. I've not yet seen any reasonable refutations...
But those are reasonable refutations. If your ideas are impractical ie not realistic or impossible then they fail a basic necessity of being unworkable.
On the contrary... suggesting that evolution is untrue is an unreasonable refutation. Suggesting that comets are 'space-rocks' was an unreasonable refutation. Both of these were once just ideas... look where they have gone from there. Many of my ideas are not feasible... this is true. But to declare them not feasible just because we do not know of a good way to implement them yet? That is arguing from ignorance.
@Rhizo: We are far more beautiful and unique than snowflakes
Snowflakes aren't people... and people truly are gems worth treasuring
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
