C---------

[Violet]

Both of those are very realistic. My ideas are sensible, and many of them practical. That the best way of implementation is not yet known = unrealistic, is arguing from ignorance. That we have not established such a degree of fairness = unrealistic, is arguing from establishment.

That I am unable to tell you my personal examples of how age restrictions don't work... is an argument from silence.

However, as I thought we had concluded in the Poll: minors seeking abortion thread: there are a number of times when this restriction becomes a human rights violation. For example: when the would be mother is forced by the 'guardian' to have, or to abort, the unborn. o.o

Why is this a rights violation? Because those beneath this age restriction: are literally slaves to their 'guardian(s)'. Is "Until an emancipation is granted by a court, a minor is still subject to the rules of their parents or guardians." not a rights violation where you come from? I believe we call that slavery. Is slavery not a human rights violation, Meatball?