Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 4, 2024, 12:15 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Intelligent design: could we do better?
#93
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
Research done.

Probably the most well known case of atavism is found in the whales. According to the standard phylogenetic tree, whales are known to be the descendants of terrestrial mammals that had hindlimbs. Thus, we expect the possibility that rare mutant whales might occasionally develop atavistic hindlimbs. In fact, there are many cases where whales have been found with rudimentary atavistic hindlimbs in the wild (see Figure 2.2.1; for reviews see Berzin 1972, pp. 65-67 and Hall 1984, pp. 90-93). Hindlimbs have been found in baleen whales (Sleptsov 1939), humpback whales (Andrews 1921) and in many specimens of sperm whales (Abel 1908; Berzin 1972, p. 66; Nemoto 1963; Ogawa and Kamiya 1957; Zembskii and Berzin 1961). Most of these examples are of whales with femurs, tibia, and fibulae; however, some even include feet with complete digits.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Intelligent design: could we do better? - by TaraJo - October 9, 2012 at 4:32 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Kayenneh - October 9, 2012 at 4:34 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:39 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:44 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:45 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:46 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:47 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:49 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:51 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:56 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 5:03 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 5:09 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Polaris - October 13, 2012 at 10:25 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 4:53 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:55 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 4:59 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Kayenneh - October 9, 2012 at 5:04 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 5:05 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Kayenneh - October 9, 2012 at 5:07 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 5:10 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 10, 2012 at 2:07 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 5:13 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 5:23 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 5:35 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by TaraJo - October 9, 2012 at 5:37 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by popeyespappy - October 10, 2012 at 12:46 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by TaraJo - October 10, 2012 at 12:59 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Haydn - October 9, 2012 at 6:10 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 6:24 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Haydn - October 10, 2012 at 4:43 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Justtristo - October 9, 2012 at 11:16 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 7:02 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 10, 2012 at 3:00 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 6:19 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 11, 2012 at 12:56 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 11, 2012 at 12:28 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 10, 2012 at 7:44 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 10, 2012 at 8:01 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 10, 2012 at 3:06 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 11, 2012 at 5:23 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by pocaracas - October 11, 2012 at 6:00 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 7:50 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 10, 2012 at 12:58 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 4:14 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 10, 2012 at 9:08 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 10, 2012 at 8:58 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by jonb - October 10, 2012 at 9:13 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 11, 2012 at 12:37 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 11, 2012 at 1:08 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darth - October 11, 2012 at 6:17 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by pocaracas - October 11, 2012 at 7:52 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by pocaracas - October 11, 2012 at 8:14 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 11, 2012 at 4:14 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 11, 2012 at 8:27 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 12, 2012 at 12:33 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 12, 2012 at 12:46 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 13, 2012 at 5:50 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 13, 2012 at 10:53 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by jonb - October 11, 2012 at 8:15 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 11, 2012 at 4:04 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 12, 2012 at 6:36 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 13, 2012 at 11:34 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 13, 2012 at 2:49 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 13, 2012 at 4:13 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 13, 2012 at 4:17 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 13, 2012 at 5:19 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 15, 2012 at 1:31 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 13, 2012 at 5:34 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by chi pan - October 14, 2012 at 11:34 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darwinian - October 13, 2012 at 4:14 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 14, 2012 at 11:51 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by chi pan - October 14, 2012 at 12:01 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 14, 2012 at 12:04 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 14, 2012 at 1:16 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1082 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  The absurdity of the idea that a complex lifeform could be designed?!?! Duty 24 1857 October 7, 2021 at 4:28 am
Last Post: slartibartfast
  Are there situations where it is better to have a low IQ? Alexmahone 41 6899 July 5, 2018 at 5:41 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2056 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Glad I could clear this up for you . . . . vorlon13 3 956 July 6, 2017 at 12:53 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  If this works it could be Huge. brewer 4 1183 April 24, 2017 at 12:44 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Do you think we could/will ever have two dominant[prime] species? Heat 11 3374 November 21, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion? Rhondazvous 47 8643 October 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Men are better than women in combat SmootherPebble 61 17428 September 11, 2015 at 6:48 pm
Last Post: thehedglin
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 5398 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)