You know, I'm pretty sure that the "Chemical Origin of Life" is just a leading hypothesis. No one (that is intellectually honest) can claim to know where life came from. Another hypothesis include that an asteroid with some matter in some stage of life hit the earth. Personally, chemicals seems the most likely to me.
As far as claiming a god as a likely source of life is... counterproductive. We have no evidence (besides a bunch of "gut-feelings" that can be recreated with the proper electrical fields) that any god even exists, so which is the more ridiculous option? Some evidence might suggest one way(life from chemical reaction), but they don't have all the evidence to prove it to be correct or that an all-powerful being swooped down and just made everything happen (which there is not even a suggestion of)? You have a serious lack of knowledge as to how science works, remedying that will not only make you more successful here, but it can really help with your day-to-day life. And honestly, ignorance to science is unforgivable in the Information Age, where everything can be looked up and fact-checked in an instant.
As far as claiming a god as a likely source of life is... counterproductive. We have no evidence (besides a bunch of "gut-feelings" that can be recreated with the proper electrical fields) that any god even exists, so which is the more ridiculous option? Some evidence might suggest one way(life from chemical reaction), but they don't have all the evidence to prove it to be correct or that an all-powerful being swooped down and just made everything happen (which there is not even a suggestion of)? You have a serious lack of knowledge as to how science works, remedying that will not only make you more successful here, but it can really help with your day-to-day life. And honestly, ignorance to science is unforgivable in the Information Age, where everything can be looked up and fact-checked in an instant.