Well, his statement that truth is dependant on perspective seems to suggest that truth is subjective and changes depending on how you look at a thing, which is wrong because a thing is true regardless of how we feel about it or whether or not we can see it or not. It seems that we are in agreeance if you are saying that a propostion that lines up with objective reality is true whereas one that does not would necesarily be false.
Now "truth" as it relates to beauty or happiness would be a subjective thing, but I would not choose to use the concept truth when dealing with such subjects except in a geometric dimensioning and tolerancing context of "true" being used to denote orthogonality.
Now "truth" as it relates to beauty or happiness would be a subjective thing, but I would not choose to use the concept truth when dealing with such subjects except in a geometric dimensioning and tolerancing context of "true" being used to denote orthogonality.
