(October 17, 2012 at 1:30 pm)genkaus Wrote:I just want to thank you for posting the only reasonable response to this point. Whether I agree with it or not, at least it makes sense!(October 17, 2012 at 8:23 am)Akincana Krishna dasa Wrote: But we see that there is consciousness in the effect - I'm conscious, I imagine you are too.
Why shouldn't consciousness exist in the cause?
Because consciousness didn't exist in the effect for a significant portion of it. Thus the reasonable conclusion is that consciousness is the effect of the effect and not a party to the cause.
Maybe your point is true, maybe not. Do models of the origin of the universe prove that consciousness didn't exist for a significant early portion of it, or are they based on that assumption?
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare