I'm putting this in "skepticism" instead of botany because it's a good example of why you should take a few minutes and figure out where the information is being sourced from.
The arguments for and against GMO's are more complicated than this, but the fact is, in the face of hunger crises and global warming, I need scientific arguments to convince me that organic is the way to go, and thus far no one's put out anything I've seen that makes me think organic does it better than GMO.
When you read something that's against (or for!) GMO's, you should always be skeptical of the source and make sure it's backed up by good testing and not one particular person or organization with a political or ideological or profitable motive.
http://skepticink.com/smilodonsretreat/2...nd-profit/
The arguments for and against GMO's are more complicated than this, but the fact is, in the face of hunger crises and global warming, I need scientific arguments to convince me that organic is the way to go, and thus far no one's put out anything I've seen that makes me think organic does it better than GMO.
When you read something that's against (or for!) GMO's, you should always be skeptical of the source and make sure it's backed up by good testing and not one particular person or organization with a political or ideological or profitable motive.
http://skepticink.com/smilodonsretreat/2...nd-profit/
![[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn569%2Fthesummerqueen%2FUntitled2_zpswaosccbr.png)
