When you stop and think about it, the number of non-critical thinking possibilities and opportunities have exploded in magnitude along with the opportunities to indulge in critical thinking.
Wouldn't that imply that there is an increasing number of potential distractions that take away from opportunities for critical thought, thus reducing the chance for people to indulge in such?
The problem with a giant list, in programming, is parsing it in a reasonable amount of time. Computers are good at it. Humans are not.
So this statement:
Is potentially unusable for the general case as it fails to note the number of distractions that take away from critical thinking or protocols to avoid such distractions.
Wouldn't that imply that there is an increasing number of potential distractions that take away from opportunities for critical thought, thus reducing the chance for people to indulge in such?
The problem with a giant list, in programming, is parsing it in a reasonable amount of time. Computers are good at it. Humans are not.
So this statement:
(October 17, 2012 at 4:17 pm)Ryantology Wrote: But, I also think there are more opportunities for kids to discover critical thinking, and multiple viewpoints, on their own today than has ever been the case before. I have most certainly learned many times as much since graduating high school as I did before doing so.
Is potentially unusable for the general case as it fails to note the number of distractions that take away from critical thinking or protocols to avoid such distractions.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
