(October 18, 2012 at 4:37 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 18, 2012 at 12:11 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: So you admit it's made up.Begs the question. For Jews are not the only ones interested in the geneology of Christ. As I pointed out Theoplus (the person in whom conscripted the book of Luke) was a gentile.
So luke for the benfit of his gentile master showed how Jesus was indeed from the line of David.
No, I'm not begging the question. I was saying your explanation is made up, not the chronology (which I think is made up too but that's beside the point here).
You ignored my main point:
teaearlgreyhot Wrote:Drich Wrote:... Since Jesus was still connected to david through marry [sic] the phrophesy [sic] would still be full [sic] filled [sic].
Which is what is up for debate. You haven't shown that!
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
