RE: Anarchism
October 21, 2012 at 5:05 pm
(This post was last modified: October 21, 2012 at 5:07 pm by JefferyHale.)
The_Germans_are_coming: Later is when I have the time! It's not dictated by you. I am not trying to gain your support or even make you understand every little detail behind my stance on this matter. I will, on my time, explain the facts & only when I see fit. I seek no approval from you, nor the collective.
You equate total freedom to "totalitarian", yet the current way the state/government functions is not? Seems about right when speaking with/to a statist.
Incorrect. Only mine & those I care about. You probably think Anarchism means chaos, right? That, without government, everything would fall apart & there would be no roads. Later, post-dinner, I will outline as to why this is a fallacy.
You equate total freedom to "totalitarian", yet the current way the state/government functions is not? Seems about right when speaking with/to a statist.
(October 21, 2012 at 5:02 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Neither is your own, apparently.
Incorrect. Only mine & those I care about. You probably think Anarchism means chaos, right? That, without government, everything would fall apart & there would be no roads. Later, post-dinner, I will outline as to why this is a fallacy.
"One must do violence to the object of one's desire; when it surrenders, the pleasure is greater."
- Marquis de Sade
- Marquis de Sade
