RE: I 'believe' in Evolution
October 22, 2012 at 12:48 am
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2012 at 12:54 am by Creed of Heresy.)
(October 21, 2012 at 11:51 pm)Polaris Wrote:(October 21, 2012 at 2:14 pm)Rhythm Wrote: LOL, macro and micro refer to our perspective of the event, not the process. Don't start this tired shit. Microevolution -is- macroevolution. Titl the lens into closer focus, pan out over wider focus. End of.
Going back and forth between genetic changes is not what I call evolution. Just because a species is undergoing Darwinian mechanisms does not mean it is really experiencing evolution.
(October 22, 2012 at 12:23 am)Polaris Wrote:(October 22, 2012 at 12:14 am)Rhythm Wrote: "Darwinianian mechanisms"..lol. You wouldn't call genetic change evolution? Strange......because that is the entirety of evolution.... What's the deal, you just don't like the word evolution or something?
No I would not label such as evolution until it is propagated through subsequent generations to a signifiant level.
(October 22, 2012 at 12:26 am)Polaris Wrote:(October 22, 2012 at 12:24 am)Rhythm Wrote: Which it does, and demonstrably so, next?
Typically it just dies out or is underrepresented in the next generation when it is no longer environmentally advantageous.
!!!MY HEADs ARE STARTING TO HURT. ALL THREE THEM.
Here, I'll sum up Polaris's position with a quote from the bible [authenticity cannot be verified at this time]:
"If Dar-WINS, we all lose!" -Platitudes 5:12
