(September 26, 2009 at 5:27 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You seem to have missed the point of what was said in the link Retorth. In serious discussion I've never seen anyone able to decide either way. Plus Those extra links you provided say exactly the same as the others. The links they provided were the most contentious ones.
Something like that can't even be decided either way according to you, and yet the Bible is apparently not ambiguous and it's a clear and well written book, huh?
This is a clear example of cherry-picking. Is it just a coincidence that since nowadays homosexuality is more accepted (and it should be of course), that you're now getting Christians pointing to parts of the bible and interpreting it in certain ways to say, "see, it's not anti-homosexuality, or at least...not necessarily - it could be argued either way."??
What about the part in the OT about how homosexuals should be stoned to death? What do the good Christians say to that? Add up all the good bits of the Bible and all the bad bits, and say it could be argued either way? What a clear and holy Holy Book that is(!) Definitely not a case of cherry-picking eh(?!)
I'm sorry but I found that funny.
EvF
