I agree this is chilling but I'd like to give a slightly different look. Is there any standard for competence in doing these types of predictions? If there is, is there some point where you would support criminal liability for doing it badly? If not, is it really a science, or a science worth using? I wonder if perhaps they are guilty of claiming to have any predictive ability on a short term basis. I'd like to see the exact wording of the statement they issued about the likelihood of an earthquake.
![[Image: generic_sig.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.blogtite.com%2Fgeneric_sig.jpg)