RE: Anarchism
October 23, 2012 at 1:01 pm
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2012 at 1:05 pm by Darkstar.)
(October 23, 2012 at 12:54 pm)JefferyHale Wrote: Yet again, the masses do not concern anarcho-capitalists. This isn't a "worldly" point of view. This isn't for the collective or the common good. This is for fairness, freedom & survival of the fittest. So, let's say that certain minorities suffered as a result of the free-market, volunteerism & complete freedom. So fucking be it! I'm against theft, even if that means the masses do well under it's pretense.
And what if the strong systematically prey on and terrorize the weak? What is strength and weakness, who own the bigger gun? Why do you think that many 'doomsday' scenarios involve chaos due to governmental collapse? If there is order of any sort, then why not just put in a government to do it? With no government, we will fall back to the capitalism that gave birth to Marxists with its inhumane treatment and abuse of the working class for a few elites.
From the image "Anarchy does not mean without rules, rather without rulers" Who will wnforce the rules, then? You? And if the other guy is stronger or has a bigger gun? Survival of the ruthless, there be no retribution if the weak couldn't defend themselves in the first place.