RE: S. E. Cupp
October 25, 2012 at 5:41 am
(This post was last modified: October 25, 2012 at 5:45 am by Brian37.)
(October 22, 2012 at 7:18 am)Faith No More Wrote: An atheist willing to defend the Christian right does sound suspicious.
I am not going to put it past any human from lying. But it is NOT impossible for an atheist to support right wing polices.
I have frequent battles with economic libertarians and green party supporters who are atheists. Ayan Rand most certainly would be supporting, not big government, but unlimited wealth and would support "trickle down".
Which is why it is a bad idea to put limus tests on labels because we as individuals are never monochromatic and always hold many possitions on many different issues. Atheists are no different.
SC is an entertainer. Pundits are entertainers, not journalists. She may be taking the role of "dissent" for the purposes of ratings because media is still privately owned and they use those shows to make money for the add space they sell.
What kills me more about her is the blatant use of her initials. For a conservitive to take Sarah Elizabeth(sp) Cupp and change it to a bra size, has to be deliberate. I don't care, but for someone who sides with the Christian Burka croud simes a bit hypocritical, although it is attention grabbing. I would laugh in her face if she said she wasn't doing that on purpose.
