Today, my daughter will mostly be wearing...

[Edwardo Piet]

So would Secular Humanism be an example then? If an atheist was 'fundy' about that?

As your example about metaphysical naturalism, I assume because it does not include the supernatural?

I still don't see how that's exactly fundamentalism though if that's what you're saying, because you can just take the Secular part off the humanism, and just add the supernatural into the naturalism, and the only difference of course, is the fact there is no longer the single non-belief of atheism. So I don't really see how you can get fundy atheists when the only differences between atheists and non-atheists are that atheists have non-belief in God.

The above is indeed an atheist view to be fundy about. But it could just as easily be a non-atheist view if you take away the single non-belief that is atheism. I don't see what your point is....? That there are world-views that are exclusive to non-belief in God, and yet can easily not be if you take away the non-belief? Well if that's your point, then I concede, but I maintain my original view that it is, IMO, a gratuitous point.

EvF