The above is not bias. It is blatant discrimination, albeit done to serve an existing audience whom does not care.
The same reason why Chick-Fil-A can continue -- their core demographic who they care very, very much for, in the end run, did not care what the myriad others who'd buy from CFA once and never again.
Nothing deeper than that.
To put in fashion speak, you can't make a modern shoe fit when the audience insists on it being from the 15th century.
If anything, the fossils who are most valued by the philharmonic have the final say.
Also, you're conflating a microcosm to the generic, all encompassing wide-spread issue outlined in preceding posts. In other words, it doesn't fit.
William Osborne's personal views do not scientific study make.
The same reason why Chick-Fil-A can continue -- their core demographic who they care very, very much for, in the end run, did not care what the myriad others who'd buy from CFA once and never again.
Nothing deeper than that.
To put in fashion speak, you can't make a modern shoe fit when the audience insists on it being from the 15th century.
If anything, the fossils who are most valued by the philharmonic have the final say.
Also, you're conflating a microcosm to the generic, all encompassing wide-spread issue outlined in preceding posts. In other words, it doesn't fit.
William Osborne's personal views do not scientific study make.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
