RE: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".
October 29, 2012 at 5:12 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2012 at 5:13 pm by Darkstar.)
See, they're not talking about a detectable god, at least not one that is detectable to people who aren't already convinced he is real, that is. Awfully convenient, isn't it...