RE: A pantheistic argument.
October 30, 2012 at 4:25 pm
(This post was last modified: October 30, 2012 at 4:31 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
I'm not in charge of defining what the universe is. I never claimed to be. For a start I didn't define the universe I defined "god" but I didn't even claim to be right about that definition either. My whole post starts with "if", did you not notice that? I merely said that if god is the universe - I'm defining "god" not the universe (and I'm not claiming to be logically justified in my definition either) - and you don't believe in the universe you therefore don't believe in god.
What faulty logic?
How are you defining god? I have said repeatedly throughout this thread that I'm defining him as the universe so all I'm saying is that if god is the universe and you don't believe in god then that means you don't believe in the universe. I never claimed that the way I'm defining god is right.
As for superstition, what superstitious claims have I made?
Quote:Secondly you try to slide this faulty logic by us ignoring that we already know the best option.
What faulty logic?
Quote:An that best option is that there is no such thing as a god so the universe cannot be a god either.
How are you defining god? I have said repeatedly throughout this thread that I'm defining him as the universe so all I'm saying is that if god is the universe and you don't believe in god then that means you don't believe in the universe. I never claimed that the way I'm defining god is right.
As for superstition, what superstitious claims have I made?
