Quote: I'm not saying it is logically sound. I explained and re-explained why I'm doing it. I'm making the argument to demonstrate how changing the label doesn't change the belief and I'm doing that because some people, in my experience, think that changing the label changes the belief.
Well once you KNOW something you don't have to believe it or argue for it, it is demonstrable beyond one's own personal bias.
So maybe I missread you, but pantheism is just woo and changing the word god to make god a natural thing is stupid. There is no need to use pantheism or even use the word god. Ochams razor says that overconflating something with excess baggage is a certian clusterfuck and will lead you away from reality.
So if you are not advocating for pantheism, then why this thread at all, just call a duck a duck and call it a day.
Pantheism=the universe is what I personally want it to be
The universe is big=the universe is big
Between the two which is opinion and which is provable fact? Which of the two seems to be the least complecated answer?
So if we are on the same page, I am sorry I missunderstood you. So now you are not arguing for pantheism?
