RE: In The Beginning ...
November 7, 2008 at 2:55 pm
(This post was last modified: November 7, 2008 at 2:58 pm by Daystar.)
Darwinian,
Science - as far as I am aware - says the Universe had a beginning, as does the Bible.
Explain how the universe couldn't have had a beginning because of time having been created with the universe. I don't understand that and would appreciate any explanation.
You say that the universe may have existed in some other form almost suggesting that it could have been the matter I mentioned in my original post?
How serious does science take the string theory of which you speak and how would that jive (or not) with the Genesis account?
You mention Aristotle and the Bible as being interchangeable in that they were both obviously false things that people believed in the past that we now know to be false and of course you would recognize the probability that in the future the same could be said for today's science, but could you point out some things that the Bible said that are now known to be false because I have never actually seen any evidence of that.
Postscript - Nice Hitchhiker’s reference.
Okay, then, what is the difference? What are Biblical "kinds" and what are species and how do they differ?
You have? I must have missed that. You most certainly have not!
Science - as far as I am aware - says the Universe had a beginning, as does the Bible.
Explain how the universe couldn't have had a beginning because of time having been created with the universe. I don't understand that and would appreciate any explanation.
You say that the universe may have existed in some other form almost suggesting that it could have been the matter I mentioned in my original post?
How serious does science take the string theory of which you speak and how would that jive (or not) with the Genesis account?
You mention Aristotle and the Bible as being interchangeable in that they were both obviously false things that people believed in the past that we now know to be false and of course you would recognize the probability that in the future the same could be said for today's science, but could you point out some things that the Bible said that are now known to be false because I have never actually seen any evidence of that.
Postscript - Nice Hitchhiker’s reference.
(November 7, 2008 at 9:26 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Biblical "kinds" are not the same as species ... think again!
Okay, then, what is the difference? What are Biblical "kinds" and what are species and how do they differ?
(November 7, 2008 at 10:06 am)Tiberius Wrote:Quote:Evidence can be subjective, wrong; but the Bible? Truth. From the start. Interesting.
Yet it's not the truth. I think we've demonstrated that over the past few days.
You have? I must have missed that. You most certainly have not!
