Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 17, 2025, 3:11 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In The Beginning ...
#12
RE: In The Beginning ...
(November 7, 2008 at 9:29 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: The bible is fiction. Whether the authors intended it to be or not, its fictional.
If I write a non-fiction book thats a load of nonsense, its ficiton in the same way as that.

You know, don't you, that just because you keep saying that it doesn't make it true. I suppose that you can't use the scripture to demonstrate that the Bible is fiction the same as you suggest that I can't use it to demonstrate it isn't. You give the baseless argument of the close minded faithful of your own religion. All that you are really saying is that the Bible can't be true because science says it isn't.

I keep trying to tell you that you need to walk before you can run so you don't even need to address the issue of its reality. You have no argument against or for that position because you don't even know what it is.
(November 7, 2008 at 10:36 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: 1953? You're serious? I'm not saying that such research is irrelevant but do you realise how much our understanding of the universe has moved in during the subsequent FIFTY FIVE years? This Filmer guy ... is he relevant? I ask this because I've done some searches and the ONLY stuff I can find on him is theological so it looks to me like he might not be the best source to quote if you're hoping to convince a bunch of secular sceptics.

Kyu, the thread was introduced with the intention to establish that the Bible has always been ahead of science; even when it wasn't thought to by science. If you are going to balk at the ancient history of 1953 science while I am talking about thousands of years you only demonstrate my point.
(November 7, 2008 at 3:02 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:
(November 7, 2008 at 2:55 pm)Daystar Wrote: You have? I must have missed that. You most certainly have not!
Well who says he hasn't? You just don't understand it/refuse to understand it.
And who says that you have demonstrated truth of God Daystar?
And how can you be so certain? Do you ignore probability again?

I am most confident, EVF - but maybe I have missed a step. Show me.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
In The Beginning ... - by Daystar - November 6, 2008 at 11:55 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Darwinian - November 7, 2008 at 3:17 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Daystar - November 7, 2008 at 2:55 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2008 at 3:02 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Tiberius - November 7, 2008 at 4:09 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2008 at 8:19 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Kyuuketsuki - November 7, 2008 at 9:26 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2008 at 9:29 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Daystar - November 7, 2008 at 3:03 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2008 at 3:09 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Daystar - November 7, 2008 at 3:25 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2008 at 3:29 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Daystar - November 8, 2008 at 11:08 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Jason Jarred - November 9, 2008 at 3:56 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Tiberius - November 7, 2008 at 10:06 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2008 at 10:28 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Kyuuketsuki - November 7, 2008 at 10:36 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Tiberius - November 7, 2008 at 5:16 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2008 at 5:41 pm
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Tiberius - November 9, 2008 at 8:43 am
RE: In The Beginning ... - by Edwardo Piet - November 9, 2008 at 11:48 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)