Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 9, 2025, 10:28 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".
#18
RE: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".
(November 1, 2012 at 9:12 am)Kirbmarc Wrote:
(November 1, 2012 at 9:09 am)apophenia Wrote: Ipse dixit proofs are not rational. They're invalid or circular.

It's not a proof. It's a definition of the terms "rational belief".

Fine. You're believing in a definition you can't detect to be probably bullshit.

I'm gonna call you 'my little rock and equivocater' — you love to equivocate and dance around.

Your first statement, if only true by definition, is not believable on a rational basis. You're trying to beg the question. And not doing it very interestingly.

"Only Y are X."

"Why?"

"Because only Y are X, by definition."

"Why?"

"Because I said so."


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". - by Angrboda - November 1, 2012 at 9:21 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Absence of Evidence genkaus 8 5087 April 17, 2012 at 11:58 am
Last Post: genkaus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)