(November 1, 2012 at 9:12 am)Kirbmarc Wrote:(November 1, 2012 at 9:09 am)apophenia Wrote: Ipse dixit proofs are not rational. They're invalid or circular.
It's not a proof. It's a definition of the terms "rational belief".
Fine. You're believing in a definition you can't detect to be probably bullshit.
I'm gonna call you 'my little rock and equivocater' — you love to equivocate and dance around.
Your first statement, if only true by definition, is not believable on a rational basis. You're trying to beg the question. And not doing it very interestingly.
"Only Y are X."
"Why?"
"Because only Y are X, by definition."
"Why?"
"Because I said so."
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)