"every dictatorship aims at eradicating recreational sex"
mhmmm probably because there never was a dictatorship which wanted it`s subjects to screw arround like they wanted and saw it as alright.
Most dictatorship use "traditional" conservative family values as a basis for creating a sociaty, there simply never was one which didn`t.
religion is totalitaran and always will be. the theocratic political argument is a totalitarian one because it claims "devine perfection" and supiriority above any opposition on the basis of that "devine perfection".
But every leadership cicrle which is untransparent - therefor shady, is likely to engage in activity seen as "antisocial" or maybe eaven be criminal, as long as that leadership cicrle believes that it`s untransparent structure will keep them protected from outside judgement. religions are not a special case - every untransparent organisation is the same.
well that is if you inforce monogamy by law or or as a social standerd.
mhmmm probably because there never was a dictatorship which wanted it`s subjects to screw arround like they wanted and saw it as alright.
Most dictatorship use "traditional" conservative family values as a basis for creating a sociaty, there simply never was one which didn`t.
religion is totalitaran and always will be. the theocratic political argument is a totalitarian one because it claims "devine perfection" and supiriority above any opposition on the basis of that "devine perfection".
But every leadership cicrle which is untransparent - therefor shady, is likely to engage in activity seen as "antisocial" or maybe eaven be criminal, as long as that leadership cicrle believes that it`s untransparent structure will keep them protected from outside judgement. religions are not a special case - every untransparent organisation is the same.
well that is if you inforce monogamy by law or or as a social standerd.
