RE: The Dalai Lama and Quantum Physics
November 6, 2012 at 7:30 pm
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2012 at 7:46 pm by passionatefool.)
Apophenia,
I am going to stop responding to you because I think you are much more interested in attacking me personally by calling and accusing me of all sort of things. Even after I said there are plenty of things in buddhism that i criticize myself. I have no desire to practice buddhism myself which is why I am an atheist. I was originally pointing out the pros as my first response in this thread as "to be fair". Giving a different perspective that atheist tend to ignore and sometimes too afraid to admit that there can be good thing with religion by giving the example of the Dalai Lama encouraging practitioner to choose science when conflict with buddhism, and that was all that I said before many of you blowing thing up. you can find the video on youtube and I am sure everywhere on the internet if you do a simple google search) I would do the same for any religion whether it is buddhism or not such as I think fundraising to help people is a positive act even if it is Christianity or hinduism. I didnt say buddhism is flawless or the holy all wonderful flowery path, if it is I wouldnt be an atheist.
To be honest I feel like you are more up in arm defend yourself, whine and complain because you infered that I somehow attack you or infer anything about you (as stated in your original response toward me). I also dont need citation because it is things from personal experience with all those years I am in practice and with the community. Are there crazy Buddhist? Yes there are but you dont generally see buddhist setting people on fire. Or wage war in the name of Buddha, whether or not you want to admit it, they are much more moderate and peaceful. There are zen buddhist involve in war but it is hardly a war because of religion but more of a political tactic used by politician such as the case with Japan. Do a google search on it and read about it, dont just look for that few rare case as an argument to your favor and ignore the abundance of other sources saying otherwise, I think it would be easier for you to do that than it is for me because my only internet access is my phone. You will see what I am talking about. I think you will find more things about Hinduism to frown upon.
All that I admit to promoting is a more reasonable logical approach as an atheist and just attack what is appropriate. However it seems like you arent an atheist so it doesnt matter.
You can think whatever you want and you can just say I am a wolf in sheep disguise. It doesnt matter to me since it is clear we hold a different view on how we should approaches issues. I am no longer interested in debating with you over something that I am accused of.
Cato123,
I think you didnt see a thing I said and I think it is completely irrelevant that you called me out on something that I am not guilty of. I didnt care much to read for apophenia's response prior to the one he/she quote me and seem to attack me in anger in which i extracted sentences from to respons to him/her.
If you read any of my response in this thread, I already clearly said that anything that is necessary to attack should be attacked such as belief or act that are harmful to others and I dont hesitate to criticize them either. I do all the time even though I live in the buckle of the bible belt in the United States. I over and over again repeated the fact that we should attack what is harmful to education and human rights or harmful in general so the little quote you quoted was unnecessary. However I appreciate that you take the effort. Thank you. Even though whoever wrote that thing is probably just another fundie atheist idiot or just an idiot that illogically exaggerate things nor really know what being moderate is so I prefer not to waste my time. Yall have a good day
I am going to stop responding to you because I think you are much more interested in attacking me personally by calling and accusing me of all sort of things. Even after I said there are plenty of things in buddhism that i criticize myself. I have no desire to practice buddhism myself which is why I am an atheist. I was originally pointing out the pros as my first response in this thread as "to be fair". Giving a different perspective that atheist tend to ignore and sometimes too afraid to admit that there can be good thing with religion by giving the example of the Dalai Lama encouraging practitioner to choose science when conflict with buddhism, and that was all that I said before many of you blowing thing up. you can find the video on youtube and I am sure everywhere on the internet if you do a simple google search) I would do the same for any religion whether it is buddhism or not such as I think fundraising to help people is a positive act even if it is Christianity or hinduism. I didnt say buddhism is flawless or the holy all wonderful flowery path, if it is I wouldnt be an atheist.
To be honest I feel like you are more up in arm defend yourself, whine and complain because you infered that I somehow attack you or infer anything about you (as stated in your original response toward me). I also dont need citation because it is things from personal experience with all those years I am in practice and with the community. Are there crazy Buddhist? Yes there are but you dont generally see buddhist setting people on fire. Or wage war in the name of Buddha, whether or not you want to admit it, they are much more moderate and peaceful. There are zen buddhist involve in war but it is hardly a war because of religion but more of a political tactic used by politician such as the case with Japan. Do a google search on it and read about it, dont just look for that few rare case as an argument to your favor and ignore the abundance of other sources saying otherwise, I think it would be easier for you to do that than it is for me because my only internet access is my phone. You will see what I am talking about. I think you will find more things about Hinduism to frown upon.
All that I admit to promoting is a more reasonable logical approach as an atheist and just attack what is appropriate. However it seems like you arent an atheist so it doesnt matter.
You can think whatever you want and you can just say I am a wolf in sheep disguise. It doesnt matter to me since it is clear we hold a different view on how we should approaches issues. I am no longer interested in debating with you over something that I am accused of.
Cato123,
I think you didnt see a thing I said and I think it is completely irrelevant that you called me out on something that I am not guilty of. I didnt care much to read for apophenia's response prior to the one he/she quote me and seem to attack me in anger in which i extracted sentences from to respons to him/her.
If you read any of my response in this thread, I already clearly said that anything that is necessary to attack should be attacked such as belief or act that are harmful to others and I dont hesitate to criticize them either. I do all the time even though I live in the buckle of the bible belt in the United States. I over and over again repeated the fact that we should attack what is harmful to education and human rights or harmful in general so the little quote you quoted was unnecessary. However I appreciate that you take the effort. Thank you. Even though whoever wrote that thing is probably just another fundie atheist idiot or just an idiot that illogically exaggerate things nor really know what being moderate is so I prefer not to waste my time. Yall have a good day
