RE: Big Bang Theory
November 8, 2012 at 9:54 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2012 at 10:04 pm by Truth Matters.)
(November 8, 2012 at 9:44 pm)jonb Wrote:(November 8, 2012 at 9:12 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: The absolute physical beginning is one of the powerful evidences for God.
Where is the absolute physical beginning? That is not the big bang
Yes, it most certainly is the Big Bang model. Borde, Guth and Vilinken's Theorem (BGV - 2003) has nailed the coffin shut on the matter with Mathematical proof.
The singularity is not some object that exploded in space. There was no space. The singularity is a boundary point demarcation whereby all physical matter, space and time do not exist causally (not temporally) prior to planck time. Another (non-physical) dimension is most certainly in evidence. We can infer certain necessary non-physical attributes safely. Sure, it's not proof of a loving, caring God, but it's definitely evidence of something with the necessary attributes of God.
(November 8, 2012 at 9:48 pm)Stimbo Wrote: First off, you argued against the Big Bang armed with nothing but the KCA. Now you're criticising atheism for not being science. Well done, I don't think there's anyone here who would disagree with you; but I do wish you wouldn't change the channels so quickly. Focus!
You suggested I had a problem with science, when I am arguing against Atheism.
(November 8, 2012 at 9:48 pm)Stimbo Wrote: First off, you argued against the Big Bang armed with nothing but the KCA. Now you're criticising atheism for not being science. Well done, I don't think there's anyone here who would disagree with you; but I do wish you wouldn't change the channels so quickly. Focus!
Stimbo, perhaps you misunderstood or mis-spoke above.
I am certainly not arguing AGAINST Big Bang. In fact, Big Bang is central to the argument.
