RE: Big Bang Theory
November 9, 2012 at 11:23 am
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2012 at 11:40 am by Truth Matters.)
(November 9, 2012 at 2:47 am)Minimalist Wrote:(November 9, 2012 at 12:42 am)Truth Matters Wrote: [quote='Minimalist' pid='360444' dateline='1352434834']
That's what their fucking bible says, Stim.
Apparently their invisible sky-daddy just winked everything into being.
What kind of asshole would fall for such silly shit?
Hey Spanky.
The subject is God, not sky daddy. God is not physically dimensioned or located. Got the concept? Then get honest about it.
What's unbelievable with a real and fully sufficient causal agency?
What's your plausible alternative?
When I say "sky-daddy" it is only because I am still in the polite phase, asshole. ( That phase just ended, btw.) Your fucking god is no more plausible than any of the other gods invented by humanity so get that through your thick jesus-freak skull.
Theists invent a god to give simple solutions to complex problems. You are obviously satisfied with that. But the Big Bang Theory says that "About 15 billion years ago a tremendous explosion started the expansion of the universe. This explosion is known as the Big Bang. At the point of this event all of the matter and energy of space was contained at one point.
Now...I know this is difficult for a mind which is content to have a bearded old man winking everything into existence but the Big Bang is not nothing. It is EVERYTHING. All matter and energy.
So kindly blow jesus out your ass.
Spanky, again nobody believes in a bearded old man located in the sky. God is not physical
Why must you continue lying about what we believe, building a straw-man God to tear down? Can't you honestly engage? Is that beyond your capacities?
Where are your arguments to justify your Atheist belief?
Where is you evidence to justify your Atheist belief?
Where is your sufficient causal agency or the PHYSICAL dimension (Universe) that science has proven began to exist?
Throwing a hissy fit and building straw-men is not an argument
(November 9, 2012 at 7:07 am)Zen Badger Wrote:(November 9, 2012 at 12:29 am)Truth Matters Wrote: That answers exactly nothing. Atheism is not scientific. Atheism is just a narrow-minded belief that nobody can justify in reason.
No, Atheism is an absence of belief in something for which there is no evidence. Nothing more.
Thusly it is very scientific.
When you have some evidence for your god boy we'll reconsider.
Atheism is not a belief position? Really?
Do Atheists not hold a belief position on whether or not God exists? Really? Answer the question.
Badger, those phony Atheist definitions won't work with me. Atheists need to justify their beliefs as beliefs.
Atheists don't 'lack a belief'. Rocks lack a belief. Humans hold beliefs. Atheists believe no God exists.