RE: Do to really believe a snake talked?!
November 10, 2012 at 4:31 am
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2012 at 4:42 am by Godscreated.)
(November 9, 2012 at 9:41 am)Stimbo Wrote:(November 9, 2012 at 1:36 am)Godschild Wrote: I can't wait to see that thing get up and run, it should be spectacular.
How about swimming:
Pachyrachis problematicus Wrote:Pachyrhachis problematicus is a snake with well-developed hind limbs known from two specimens from the Cenomanian of the Middle East. [. . .] Confirmed morphology best supports the phylogenetic hypothesis that Pachyrhachis is a basal macrostomatan snake. Limb retention in a basal macrostomatan snake implies that loss of hind limbs occurred multiple times within Serpentes.
Not enough? Well, how about:
Haasiophis terrasanctus
Eupodophis descouensi
Najash rionegrina
It's interesting, isn't it, that your favourite story hinges on a serpent with legs that becomes cursed with crawling on its belly, yet when shown known evolutionary evidence of exactly that, suddenly it becomes a problem for you. One might almost conclude that your belief isn't quite as strong as you seem to want to think.
I truly would like to see these snakes get up and run on their hind legs... oh that's right they are no longer with us so that's impossible, how unfortunate. Know what else is impossible, to know how these snakes live and if their appendages were useful or not. All that is nothing more than speculation and whether you want to admit it or not is your problem. I have enough sense to know these people who described these snakes never saw them and can at best speculate. Yeah, you need to bring some real proof to the table. My belief grows daily and being on this site helps to confirm I'm correct in what I know.
I do not know of a snake that doesn't swim, if there is one it was probably the ones you mentioned, the Great Flood thing you know.
(November 9, 2012 at 10:52 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote:(November 8, 2012 at 8:01 pm)Godschild Wrote: God has always been and is the cause of all that has ever existed.
You say god has always been as if it is a fact. It isn't a fact, it's a bullshit belief. And it's a bullshit belief because you can't even offer up any evidence for god even being real, let alone "always been".
Come back with credible evidence that god is something more than a made up gap filler, and THEN you can start talking about how he's "always been".
If god could always have been, then so could the universe. Which of course would mean no need for god.
God is not a physical being, matter has to have a cause and God caused it. You guys like to say egotistical man made up gods, why, their and our egos would not allow for this. Man, outside of the knowing of God has no real reason to have gods, most of mankind has always set himself highest on the pedestal.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.