(November 12, 2012 at 6:45 pm)festive1 Wrote:(November 12, 2012 at 6:30 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: As an atheist, it's clear that social darwinism is right.
Helping the poor, the disabled and disadvantaged is, ironically, the creation of the religious.
A truly secular world will treat humans according to their own worth. Only the strongest should survive.
In fact, I'm ashamed of atheists on welfare.
Ummm... You should change your religious views from Neo-Humanism then... Social Darwinism is the antithesis of humanism, neo or not.
Uhh no.
Social darwinism ultimately creates a better, stronger human race. This is the best expression of humanity I've seen, and no other comes close.
Unless you are trying to suggest that human life is special. It's not. Dawkins says as much in his books.
