(November 16, 2012 at 12:47 pm)Drich Wrote: ..And appearently you do not understand how a conversation works.This coming from the guy who largely ignores what I have to say. You could, oh I don't know, manage a little "common courtesy" and answer some of my responses to your threads once in a while? Is that too difficult for you? Or do I have to address you as "Douche" from now on Drich? You decide if you're on the level or not.
Quote:If person A and I are 3 or 4 posts into a conversation and person b decides to only read the last post, and from his position of ignorance decides he has everything figured out and can not help himself but to plop down his hasty secular reasoning in lew of an informed post, then I have absolutly every right in this "public domain" to remind person b (or c for that matter) that the comments he has addressed were not meant for him. I can also go on to remind that person that everything I say does not apply to everyone. If I quote the person, then the post I quoted is directed to that person specifically. If what I said to person A does not apply to you then you (just in the way of common courtesy) should have nothing to say in return. That does not mean if what I said does apply to you, you can not jump in. Or if I make an open post that is not addressed to anyone then I welcome all view point (even if it does not apply.)I refer you to the forum rules:
Quote:Debating is to be civil, and can either be a point for point debate or one where many points are raised and discussed, with rebuttals from either side coming in at various times.
Sorry, but you do not get to segregate your audience if you want to have a debate with us on the public domain.
If you cannot respond to all the points raised then you should try to address them all simultaneously where possible and apologise if you cannot and offer members a private discussion about said thread/topic with you instead.
So far Douche, all you've managed to demonstrate to me, is that your attitude, as usual, stinks.